Archive for the ‘Research’ Category

LinkedIn Survey Results - Preparing for the Recovery

Matt Warburton | October 13th, 2009 | 11:18 pm
Matt Warburton

Gain insights into recruiting trends and learn how corporate recruiters have been preparing for better days

A recent LinkedIn report on recruiting details how corporate recruiting professionals are doing business in tough economic times and preparing for the recovery.   The recession, the rise of social networking, and an increase in the use of technology are three key factors influencing current trends in corporate recruiting. With tightening budgets, spending has been shifting from 3rd party agencies and job boards, to corporate websites, employee referrals, and Professional & Social Networks.  About 30% of companies plan to spend more time and money on Professional or Social Networks.

While it is important for corporate recruiters to be more efficient with their budgets, it is crucial that companies nurture a strong talent pool in preparation for the recovery.  Survey results show that LinkedIn is the main avenue for building relationships with passive talent.   In addition, recruiters indicated that building a strong employment brand is an essential and long lasting trend in recruiting.

The full research report addresses the following topics:

  • What are in-house recruiters doing to prepare for the recovery?
  • What could their competitors do to prepare for the recovery that would make them most nervous?
  • What have they been doing to face the current downturn?
  • What sources of hire and recruiting trends do they believe in most?
  • Where they will invest more/less
  • How they find passive candidates
  • Other trends in corporate recruiting

Click here to get the full report

 

HR Survey - Networking is most valuable tool in a job search

Matt Warburton | August 19th, 2009 | 1:57 pm
Matt Warburton

A recent survey from Challenger, Gray & Christmas indicates that networking offline and online are the most effective job search methods.

Challenger, Gray & Christmas released results from a survey of HR executives, asking them to rate the effectiveness of various job search methods on a scale of 1 (least effective) to 5 (most effective).  The results show that networking both offline and online (on sites such as LinkedIn) were the most effective methods with average ratings of 3.98 and 3.3, respectively.  Responding to newspaper classified ads (1.7) and attending job fairs (1.6) were the least effective.

Here is the ranked list of all the job search methods asked in the Challenger, Gray & Christmas survey

  1. Networking
  2. Using social/professional networking sites
  3. Targeted management recruiting firms
  4. Using online job boards
  5. Applying for jobs via an employer’s website
  6. Cold-calling employers
  7. Sending unsolicited resumes to employers
  8. Responding to newspaper ads
  9. Attending job fairs

While this ranking represents the effectiveness of job search methods, HR executives likely answered the question based on their experience sourcing candidates.  We believe this ranking also represents the most effective methods for sourcing candidates.  Here are our thoughts on the topic:

Traditional networking lives on
Traditional networking represents the old model - it’s “who you know and how well”.  If you are not connected, you will have trouble even coming up with candidates names.  However, traditional networking has its drawbacks - lacking scale, efficiency and discoverability. Finding the right target  is the first hurdle for traditional networking, requiring a lot of time, phone calls, emails, etc. to see if anyone in your extended “offline network” has the background and qualifications you are looking for.

Social and Professional networks represent the new way of doing things
“Who you know and how well” is still very current, but the the second part of the proposition, i.e. “how well”, is increasingly becoming the real differentiator. Indeed, now anyone can find target names with tools like LinkedIn Recruiter.

Not only will LinkedIn help you find candidates, it will also help you jump-start the conversation.  Locking in the best candidate for a job is beyond just identifying a name.   The real value-add is finding a way to engage the candidate and start a conversation - building the best story or angle of approach.   We consistently hear from recruiters that the response rate is very high for contacts via LinkedIn InMail.  LinkedIn members are receptive to having conversations about networking or job opportunities.

So, if online networks are so great, then why does traditional networking still rank the highest?
Well first, because there are still a few people out there who have not fully understood the value of professional networking yet and have still to create a profile on LinkedIn, despite all the success stories. With about 2 million professionals signing up every month, this is changing very quickly though.

Second, having a strong network is still indispensable to find out who are truly the best people (and employers).

Third, your network helps you get an introduction to the target candidate so the first call is a warm call.

Lastly, your network helps you be a better informed and connected professional overall (the best recruiters are the ones who understand their companies and businesses best).

The smartest recruiters realize that online and offline networking are not mutually exclusive and that the internet helps augment their ability to maintain relationships and efficiently reach more candidates.  For every person that you meet offline, they have a whole network of people online who you can reach through them.  Recruiters that utilize online networks will have a competitive advantage over the folks who don’t adapt to the changing landscape.

What do you think is the most effective job search method?  Leave us a comment with your answer.

 

Poll result confirms LinkedIn is fertile ground for sourcing passive candidates

Matt Warburton | July 9th, 2009 | 9:45 am
Matt Warburton

54% of poll respondents indicate they are employed and not actively looking for opportunities.  A further 23% are employed but are actively looking.

In a prior blog post we highlighted poll results showing that employers think that passive candidates result in better employees.  To build upon that information, we wanted to get a sense for the percentage of LinkedIn members that are passive candidates. To answer this question, we fielded a poll asking LinkedIn members to indicate if they were employed or unemployed and whether or not they were actively looking for a job. As of July 1st, 3,700 LinkedIn members took the poll.

Results show that at least 36% of LinkedIn members are employed, not actively looking, but still open to good job leads. With over 43 million total LinkedIn members, 36% represents a large number - over 15 million professionals. These are the most sought-after passive candidates, the ones that recruiters want to find and contact right before they even think of initiating their next job search.

Why? First, because recruiters want to identify the best performers before someone else hires them and, second, because they want to do that at a time when these passive candidates are likely to take their call or reply to an email, if the position is the right one of course.

The next best group of passive candidates are those that are employed, yet are not looking for a job at all - yielding an additional 18%.   Combining these two groups of passive candidates brings the total to 54% - 23 million passive candidates.

The results from these two polls confirm that not only are passive candidates better employees, but that LinkedIn is the place to find them.

What do you think?  Leave us a comment with your thoughts.

job_status

 

LinkedIn Poll - Recruiters plan to use professional sites more to recruit

Matt Warburton | June 23rd, 2009 | 12:43 pm
Matt Warburton

Recent LinkedIn Polls show that recruiters plan to use social and professional sites more to recruit.

Two recent LinkedIn polls addressed the topic of using Social Sites for recruiting. One poll asked whether respondents plan to use social and professional sites more to recruit - 86% said Yes, 8% said No, and 5% said Unclear.

Here are a few interesting comments on the poll page:

“If you aren’t using web 2.0 technology to recruit already you are behind all your peers”

“I don’t see Facebook, Myspace, or Twitter as adding much value to recruiting because those sites are geared more towards social/recreational interaction than professional interaction. But networking sites like LinkedIn are a huge part of my daily recruiting strategy.”

Do you plan on using social and professional networks more to recruit?

plan-social

A related question asks which Social Sites have you used most successfully to hire. Given the information above, it will be no surprise to you that the overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that LinkedIn was most successful site (93%), with Facebook a distant second with only 4%. Granted, the fact that this poll was on LinkedIn, skews the results towards LinkedIn. However, we are happy to see that our members are getting value out of our site.

Recruiters, which social sites have you used most successfully to hire?

social-sites

What do you think about the results from these three polls?  Do you plan to use social sites more to recruit? Let us know your thoughts in a comment on this blog post.

 

LinkedIn Poll Results - Passive Candidates are better employees

Matt Warburton | June 12th, 2009 | 11:53 am
Matt Warburton

Recruiters say passive candidates are better employees

The LinkedIn team started a series of three polls over the last month that have received interesting results.

The first poll asked whether passive candidates were better employees - 60% said Yes, 23% said No, and the remaining 16% indicated that it was unclear.

We were expecting such an answer. It’s a widely held belief that the best talent is employed and that top performers get hired into new positions (including internal transfers) even before they start looking.  This explains why recruiters value referral programs, social networks sourcing, talent networks and thir party agencies so much. They are all great sources to identify the best talent early.

Recruiters, do you find better employees when hiring passive candidates?

passive

There was quite a bit of discussion on the poll results page.  Some felt that the attitude of the candidate had a bigger impact than whether they were passive. Others commented that passive status indicated a level of satisfaction between the employee and the employer (i.e. if they are actively looking then maybe they are not as good, or not as loyal.).

We want to hear your thoughts on this topic.  Please post your comments to this blog.

Stay tuned to this blog to get the results of the remaining two polls in this series.