Archive for the ‘Guest Bloggers’ Category

Making Just-in-Time Talent a Reality



jschnyder | April 11th, 2012 | 6:00 am

Jim Schnyder has spent the last 11 years within the recruiting organization at PepsiCo, a $60B+ global company that counts Pepsi, Frito Lay, Tropicana, Quaker, Gatorade and many other household names in its stable of brands. He is SourceCon’s reigning GrandMaster Sourcer. He also headed up the initial rollout of LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline across PepsiCo’s global talent acquisition team.
headshot_square21

PepsiCo's Jim Schnyder

Imagine a world in which you have a way of sourcing just-in-time talent: where you can map out targeted talent pools in various geographies and functions, easily track their professional updates, cultivate relationships, and turn straight to those pools as opportunities arise in your organization. Now imagine you can do that seamlessly across a global talent acquisition team. I’ve spent the last several months testing and contributing to LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline, a solution that I believe will get us there, sooner than you think.

At PepsiCo, thanks to our global brand strength, we have the fortune of having many active jobseekers in our system. But, like any organization intent on hiring the best of the best, we have our work cut out finding the right candidates. We need to scour the entire talent pool – whether or not they are looking. It’s not until someone taps a happily employed top performer on the shoulder with a stronger opportunity that they lift their head up from what they’re doing on a day-to-day basis and consider a change. Which is why, despite our brand position, recruiting passive prospects has never been more critical to PepsiCo.

As you know, working with passive candidates has a lot in common with the sales process: you need to identify your prospects, do the outreach, build relationships, and manage your pipeline over time, converting leads to candidates and ultimately hires. PepsiCo historically faced a common industry challenge here: managing and tracking our talent leads over time. We tried various CRM tools which suffered from the same major drawback: no sooner did we enter the information than it was out of date. Our leads shifted industries, functions, regions, even names, while their records stayed static.

While our sourcing team tended to use those CRM tools, the broader team either found low value in them or didn’t have access. As a result, they continued to stick with their own ad hoc solutions: a spreadsheet on this hard drive, a pile of business cards in that drawer, a stack of resumes in a file cabinet over there, a bunch of sticky notes on that wall. And with the same ad hoc, low-tech techniques being deployed by colleagues in different markets around the world, the net result: no cohesive talent pool, rather a host of leads across many silos.

I truly think our world is about to shift with LinkedIn’s launch of Talent Pipeline. As one of six charter customers involved in the rollout, I’ve had the opportunity to lead implementation efforts within PepsiCo, work with LinkedIn on making improvements to the product, and drive adoption across our global team. It’s already clear to me that this solution will transform what’s possible for our recruiting organization.

In Talent Pipeline, we now have a centralized system in which we can create talent pools – based on LinkedIn searches, but also from other sources that we upload to the Recruiter platform, such as our own spreadsheets, random files, and more – that are globally accessible, searchable and editable.

We’re already seeing our team collaborate much more willingly, since we leverage source codes for every lead and tag them appropriately, so that we’re able to track everyone’s contributions. Additionally, these new tools are part of the LinkedIn Recruiter platform, which the team was already using. It’s intuitive and it’s almost an industry standard.

And best of all – and this is what makes Talent Pipeline a game changer in my opinion – every lead is current. Many of them are created from deep searches on LinkedIn. Any leads that we upload are cross-checked against LinkedIn’s 150 million plus network and tied to the appropriate profiles. Now, as our prospects move, we are able to follow their progress with up-to-date information and continue to stay in touch. We can also use insights from their activity updates, recommendations, groups and more to keep communications relevant and useful.

So, what’s my vision for just-in-time talent? Here’s an example of how I foresee using this tool in future. Let’s say I routinely recruit accountants in the Boulder, Colorado area. I can run a targeted search using the LinkedIn Recruiter technology to get to that population. Separately, I can network outside of LinkedIn using any of my other favorite sources, gather leads in an excel template and upload them to Talent Pipeline. Many of them will already have LinkedIn profiles, and the system will automatically match them. Others won’t, and that’s OK; LinkedIn will create a record that lives in my system only (not on the public LinkedIn platform).

As time goes by, I can return to this pool, keep in touch with them, and when I’m hiring another CPA in the Boulder area nine months from now, I know exactly where to start. I can filter within that group and selectively send out messages, more or less tapping them on the shoulder to see if they’re interested or know of someone. No more starting from scratch.

I can imagine this same technology being used to help us set up all sorts of similar talent pools – drawing on graduating classes from targeted business schools/colleges, for example, and other populations that can be hard to keep in touch with as they change jobs, locations and even names.

This is just the start of the journey for Talent Pipeline so it isn’t perfect yet – but if you’re looking for a way to build just-in-time pools of prospects and passive candidates, I’d strongly encourage you to check it out when it launches in the next few weeks. No matter how much you love LinkedIn Recruiter, a few months from now you’ll wonder how you ever got along without this new functionality. And if you’re not yet using LinkedIn Recruiter, there has never been a better time to take the plunge.



 

Secrets of Recruiters with the Best InMail Response Rates: Centrica’s James Dowling



Leela Srinivasan | March 29th, 2012 | 6:00 am

leela_smallLet’s face it: recruiting passive talent can be challenging. What does it take to attract the highest quality candidates, the ones who are satisfied and productive in their current jobs? This is the first in a series of posts showcasing the insights, tips and tools driving the success of some of the best passive candidate recruiters.

We analyzed data from thousands of LinkedIn Recruiting SolutionsCentrica's James Dowling
customers globally and conducted in-depth interviews with seven customers who have among the highest InMail response rates (InMail is LinkedIn’s messaging tool). Through these conversations, we uncovered critical insights and practical tips that you can implement in your day-to-day job. We kicked things off with James Dowling, who spent the first eight years of his career in 3rd party search before moving in-house in 2008 to work for Centrica Plc, a UK headquartered Energy company.

Why does your company focus on recruiting passive candidates?

Talent is enormously important to Centrica. People make all the difference, especially as we are a service organization, so we are focused on hiring the best.

Interestingly, many of our most successful individuals haven’t come from our industry: they tend to come from Retail Banking, Financial Services, Telecommunications, IT – they are all fast paced, complex, multi-channel businesses. Our downstream business model is more in line with theirs, but they may not be thinking about a career in Energy. Therefore we have to headhunt the right talent.

What’s the biggest mistake you can make when trying to recruit passive candidates?

A scattergun approach, with mass communication and untargeted emails, does not work. Instead, a focused target approach does.

Inviting an open conversation works too, rather than proposing a specific role.  So instead of, “Can I talk to you about XYZ role?” it is better to write, “I wanted to introduce you to our company. Let’s talk about your career and see if something is suitable.” People are then far more open to responding.

In order to get candidates’ attention, I create a meaningful incentive that’s relevant to them. For example, if I were targeting someone from Retail Banking, I would contrast their industry’s current cost-cutting environment with the opportunity for growth in the Energy sector. I want to be specific, thinking about what that candidate is going through, and what he/she wants.

How much time do you spend finding exactly the right professional profiles at the outset?

I have to have a total understanding of the business, the role, and the type of person we want. The more research I can do up front, the better the results. I am far more interested in spending 10 hours researching 15 candidates and getting a dozen promising responses than spending five hours reaching 100 candidates, but only getting three such responses.

Getting to know where we acquire our talent is important too. We uncover trends by understanding which companies and sectors we’ve recruited from, and then track those employees’ progress in our organization per business areas (upstream and downstream Energy and by function). We further research those companies qualitatively; we want to understand why high performing employees hired from Company A are successful while those from Company B never are.

How do you kick off a new requirement with a hiring manager?

It’s an intensive face-to-face process. I have to go though the job description with them and challenge it. I also get an independent perspective on the role from another HR colleague if I can.  I ask where the hiring manager wants to find this person, and what companies and sectors are doing it well. We create a matrix together: sectors by companies, and then target the actual roles, titles, and experience that we want.

The more expert I am with each assignment, the more hiring managers will trust me as their strategic resourcing partner. LinkedIn data is part of the knowledge I bring to the relationship; when market mapping, for example, we fill 60 percent of it or more with LinkedIn candidates.

Any advice on winning over a hiring manager who doesn’t think you have the expertise?

I come prepared with a range of strong profiles, and ask, “Is this what you’re looking for?” It shows them what I know and helps persuade them to accept that we can recruit without an external headhunter. Also I prepare for an initial internal meeting as I would if I were an external search consultant, sometimes more.

What’s your favorite success story in recruiting a passive candidate?

We wanted to recruit an Underwriting Director (Senior Vice President) for a new business we created – British Gas Insurance. It was a very niche role, very senior, and in a business sector we had no name for at the time. Through LinkedIn we mapped out the market and we brought in an outstanding candidate from a top-five global insurance company. One of the insurance company board directors praised the resourcing team for our innovative approach.

dowling-takeaways_blog

What are some of your best practices in recruiting passive candidates? Tweet your thoughts with the hashtag #passivetalent. We want to hear from you!

Stay tuned for our next conversation with Brazil-based Camila Tartari of Thoughtworks. She has a trick for getting an inMail response that works almost 100 percent of the time!



 

How Your Amazing LinkedIn Profile Can Drive Hard Business Results



Jason Seiden | January 17th, 2012 | 6:39 pm

Jason SeidenCan you use your LinkedIn profile to overcome the following candidate objections?

“The job’s too far away.”
“I’m happy where I am.”
“The pay isn’t enough.”

Sometimes, you really can.

Because sometimes, the above objections aren’t really on the level. Sometimes, they’re code for:

“I don’t trust you.”
“You’re making me uncomfortable.”
“If you’re the face of the company, then I’m not feeling the love here.”

So while you as a talent professional prepare to meet candidates’ objections, often, your preparation assumes that you can take a person at his or her word. Which you can’t always do.

Now, it’s important to note that just because someone snows you doesn’t mean the person’s a coward or a bad egg. Good people soften their punches, too, often with good reason. They may want to avoid that inevitable argument that happens when you disagree with them, for instance. Whatever. The point is, this behavior is natural, common, and acceptable.

And it leads to the conclusion that sometimes, the problem is us, even when we’re told it’s something else.

Of course, we still have to fix it. Here are four tips for eliminating candidates’ unspoken objections:

1. (Overall) Build a credible profile. When you reach out to someone, make sure you come across as someone worth their time.

2. (Experience) Don’t speak resumé. When LinkedIn launched, it made sense that people would treat profiles like just an online resumé. Not anymore. In 2012, we need to be thinking “professional profile of record,” which is so much more! We need to show candidates that we represent the type of organization that sees the potential to use Specialties, Skills, and Applications to bring static information to life! LinkedIn gives us the ability to turn bullet points into a story! Because here’s the thing: if I’m Grade A talent, I don’t want to see you doing things “the way it’s always been done,” I want to see you pushing the boundaries of what’s possible!

3. (Headline) Pick an audience. Write for someone specific. I get requests to connect from “technical recruiters” all the time. Why should I connect with you? What makes you a better fit for me? Don’t tell me you’re a “passionate technical recruiter,” that won’t cut it. (See #2.) Are you focused on a certain company or industry or geographic region? On a particular level of professional? Zeroing in on an audience helps me say yes to you when the fit is there!

4. (Photo) Get Profersonal™. Profersonal™ = professional + personal. It’s a made-up word, and it’s exactly what people want from you online. The standard corporate headshot is nice but lacks personality; that party shot of you shows off your smile but may not be someone I’d entrust my career to. Err on the side of professional, but see if you can find a shot that communicates both professionalism and personality.

Making these changes can help you increase the efficiency of your sourcing process by helping quality candidates say yes to you personally, so that together you can work on the nuts and bolts of the opportunity at hand. Which means that fixing your profile can, indeed, drive business results.

Jason Seiden is co-Founder of Ajax Social Media, a company dedicated to helping professionals use LinkedIn to drive business results. Find him at http://www.linkedin.com/in/seiden, and join him for a webcast with more tips for optimizing your LinkedIn profile this Wednesday, January 18.



 

New survey suggests passive candidate recruiting is about to accelerate



LouAdler | December 19th, 2011 | 5:30 am

adlerLast year I worked with the remarkable LinkedIn Research Network on a major survey of professionals’ job-hunting status. We refreshed the survey this year, and surprisingly, not much has changed: 83% of fully-employed respondents are not actively looking while only 17% are. Within a few percentage points, this is the same as last year.

The graph below summarizes the job-hunting status of the 4,550 respondents and what each group would look for if they were to switch jobs. Obviously, the less active the person, the more selective he or she was from a job needs standpoint.

Interestingly, of the 17% who were active candidates, less than half were first going to a company career site to find a job of interest. Instead these active job hunters were either trying to get a referral through an employee, or first searching for a job using a search engine or aggregator.

job-needs-by-job-hunting-status-4

The 83% who classified themselves as passive split up into three big groups. The Tiptoers, 15% of the total, were very quietly and selectively contacting former co-workers to see if anything of merit was available. So in some way, these people could be considered slightly active. However, they would only move for a better job. Explorers (40% of the total respondents), who were open to explore a situation if a recruiter called, would only consider a major career move to make the switch. Super Passives, at 28%, were not looking at all, but most were still open to connect with a recruiter for future opportunities, making them a great group to network with.

In my mind, the sweet spot for sourcing and maximizing Quality of Hire includes Explorers, Tiptoers and Searchers. Searchers are active candidates who have just entered the job-hunting market, and getting to them first is a huge competitive advantage. This is where SEO/SEM comes into play. But you’d better not use boring job descriptions to capture their attention, since they’re looking for something better than what they now have. Remember, they are fully-employed and more discriminating than the very active candidates.

Since Tiptoers have indicated some interest in leaving, the best way to connect with them is through your employee referral program. Make sure your employees reach out to their best former co-workers and connect with them ahead of time. Then when the Tiptoers start looking, they’ll find your employees first. But again, make sure your jobs are compelling. Tiptoers are looking for something much better than they now have.

To find Explorers, I suggest using LinkedIn Recruiter by connecting with your employees and searching their first degree connections. Cherry pick the best from their network, ask your employee about their qualifications, then contact them. Since they’re prequalified and will call you back, you’ll be able to shorten the time to build a slate of final candidates to a few days. However, to be successful, it is vital you understand how to recruit and network with these people. Recognize that the recruiting process and workflow needed to source and recruit passive candidates is far different than the process used for active candidates. Explorers in particular will only engage with a corporate recruiter if the opening sounds like a great career opportunity, and even then they’ll want lots of information before proceeding. Despite this, Explorers are worth the time and effort.

As the labor markets continue to heat up, the first half of 2012 could be more challenging from a recruiting standpoint than thought just a few months ago. LinkedIn Recruiter is a great asset though, and in the right hands can help you through the toughest of recruiting challenges. All it requires to take full advantage of this vast network is a great recruiter and a great job. What else could you ask for?



 

Connect with talent on your employees’ LinkedIn profile pages



Daniel Shapero | September 20th, 2011 | 8:36 am

shapero-head-shotOver the last few years, your employees have been establishing their presence on LinkedIn by building their profiles and connecting with other professionals. These employee profiles are the primary way outside professionals experience your company on LinkedIn.  Most great recruiting teams already leverage their employees through referral programs, but what if you could have a voice in the interactions already taking place between your employees and candidates.  Let me introduce you to LinkedIn’s new recruiting product, Work With Us.

Work With Us promotes your company’s jobs or recruiting message every time your employees’ profiles are viewed on LinkedIn, which can happen hundreds or thousands of times per day depending on your company. Your company will have exclusive access to the ad unit on every profile page, making it incredibly easy to gain a voice in these interactions at scale.

We have learned that these moments are the perfect times to share personalized jobs or promote your employment brand.  Work With Us campaigns can deliver 10-50x the results of typical banner ads.  Why is Work With Us so effective?  It’s simple and intuitive… we present the right opportunities to the right person, at the right time.
wwu-example-41

Here is an example. Peter, a software engineer, is looking at the profile of an Autodesk software executive named Albert.  Perhaps Peter read a blog post about Albert’s work, or they met at a conference, or they worked together at a prior firm.  At this moment Peter is thinking about Albert’s work at Autodesk, AND Peter is likely to be the sort of person that Autodesk would be interested in.  When is a better time to promote career opportunities to Peter than when he reading the LinkedIn profile of one of Autodesk’s executives? Work With Us allows Autodesk to do just that, by showing Peter engineering jobs personalized to his background—automatically.

Client results have been truly remarkable.  Take a look at Autodesk Head of EMEA Talent Acquisition and Global Talent Brand Matthew Jeffery’s LinkedIn profile to see Work With Us in action, or visit my profile to see how LinkedIn is using Work With Us.

To hear more about how Autodesk is attracting top talent on LinkedIn, register for Matthew Jeffery’s webinar on September 27th.

Click here to learn more about Work With Us or to contact LinkedIn for more information.