Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

Five questions you must ask your hiring manager



Leela Srinivasan | April 19th, 2012 | 3:00 am

And other great passive talent tips from Betfair’s Rachel Riddington

leela_small2How do you set yourself up for success with passive candidates? You start by asking your hiring managers five key questions that quickly elevate your understanding of the role and the type of person who will be successful in it, according to Rachel Riddington, a sourcing and research consultant with Betfair, who enjoyed InMail response rates north of 50 percent last year.

Rachel Riddington

Rachel Riddington, research and sourcing consultant at UK-based Betfair

Welcome to Part III of our interview series on best practices in passive candidate recruiting. Read on to discover the tips and tricks that consistently increase the Betfair team’s odds of getting a response from passive talent.

Tell us about Betfair and the types of talent you hire.

Betfair is one of Europe’s top internet companies. We’re enjoying fantastic growth, and we need top talent to support that growth. We’re an interesting organization because we fit in the gaming and internet sectors, and our trading platform means we also share skill sets with such industries as Financial Services. Our talent needs are diverse and often very niche.

Why does your company focus on recruiting passive candidates?

Active candidates are only about 20 percent of the talent pool, and we want to see 100 percent of the talent pool!

At the senior level, all of our recruiting is based on passive candidates. At more junior levels, it’s probably more than we understand, because many of the passive candidates we approach now show up as active applicants later on.

Are there any best practices that you learned the hard way?

The biggest mistake I’ve made is being too general: candidates then feel like they’re getting spammed and don’t respond. I’ve learned that there are no short cuts: I need to take the time to understand what someone does and what they’d be appropriate for.

What specific questions do you ask hiring managers when working on a new req?

1) “What type of personality are you looking for?” In addition to technical skills, I need to understand the personality types desired. The role may be heavy on client interaction, or visionary insights, or overnight shifts: I have to spend time uncovering these things.

2) “In which organizations or sectors can I expect to find this talent?” Asking hiring managers for search input is a useful starting point. When applicable I make sure to clarify what “competitors” means, because Betfair spans a variety of sectors and has competitors in each.

3) “What do you think about this profile?” I try to review profiles with hiring managers throughout the process in order to understand what they like and what they don’t like. Often it’s more difficult for them to articulate what they don’t like, so profiles are a good way to drill down on that.

4) “Who do you know whom you’d like to hire?” It’s amazing how many times recruiters get through three-fourths of the process and the hiring manager asks why they haven’t spoken to XYZ person. It’s critical to ask up front, and even if it’s not possible to get the candidate on board now, it’s a relationship worth building.

5) “What’s the sales story?” Beyond the role, I need to know what the team is doing that makes the role exciting. I need details to help sell candidates on why they would join us versus a competitor.

How do you go about pipelining talent?

First, I try to build such a strong relationship with hiring managers that I have an idea what they have coming in six months’ time.

Next, I focus on building long-term relationships with candidates, so that when the timing is right, I am already in dialogue with them. I try to build my network of candidates across multiple areas, and often many end up serving as networking resources, information sources, and even future clients.

Last, I support my online work with face-to-face time. I send InMails, but I also make phone calls. I’ll note certain events on my calendar to touch base in person, and will meet with as many people as possible during conferences.

What InMail messaging has been most successful for you?

Personalization is key. Rather than writing, “We’re looking for this,” my message is, “I want to talk to you, not just for a role today, but also for the future.”

While I try very hard to make sure that I approach people in the right areas, if I’m not 100 percent sure, I will keep the InMail more general, so that it is appropriate for them regardless. Sure, I’ll send 30 InMails in one go, but I will try very hard to have candidates feel like I am contacting them alone as opposed to 30 people.

How does your passive candidate recruiting strategy differ depending on seniority of position to fill?

There is more depth to the process at more senior levels. It’s sometimes not possible to call every candidate on the phone when recruiting for 50 jobs at a time, so email suffices. With senior candidates though, I aim to speak with each one, whether or not they are a good fit. I also try to do a detailed phone interview before I put anyone in front of a team member.

Betfair key takeaways

 Do you have a best practice to share? Tweet your thoughts with the hashtag #passivetalent. We want to hear from you!



 

Bersin IMPACT Conference, Told in 20 Tweets



Leela Srinivasan | April 16th, 2012 | 6:55 am

leela_small1Bersin & Associates has hosted its IMPACT conference for five years now, but it’s only in the last year or two that talent acquisition has become a significant portion of the program. I had the chance to attend the event in St. Petersburg, FL last week and was impressed by the caliber of the attendees and the discussion.

Rather than rehash the conference in long-form, I’ve aggregated 20 tweets into six themes that capture my main observations, from Josh Bersin’s keynote and from the talent acquisition-focused breakout sessions:

Sweeping trends
1) #1 driver of HR change: accelerated globalization. “China now feels like Tokyo” @josh_bersin
2) #2 driver of HR change: global talent imbalance & emergence of “the expertise economy”
3) #3 driver of HR change: emergence of Big Data & impact on talent analytics

It’s all about the candidate
4) “Candidate relationship management isn’t a technology, it’s a practice” – Kim Lamoureux
5) Give EVERY candidate in your funnel a positive experience, even at the very top #passivetalent
6) Eaton Corp: does your career page help people self-select into applying? Wrong candidates in funnel dilute recruiting impact
7) Halliburton: employer brand does NOT equal marketing campaign, though every touchpoint has at least 1 component of our EVP

Leveraging every employee in talent acquisition
8) UnitedHealthcare: what % of YOUR employees participate in your employee referral program? Are the rest struggling to articulate your brand?
9) “It’s not just RECRUITING’S job to recruit, it’s EVERYONE’S job”. Heather Lemke speaks the truth!

The present – and future – of recruiting
10) Name generation is commoditized – “I could teach my 10 yr old to source” – REAL recruiting skills making a comeback
11) “An agile organization is always recruiting” – farming, branding, relationship mgt.
12) Social IS recruiting for us. It’s how we go to market – @ljbrock
13) Could recruiting REALLY report into marketing in the next 5 years?

Getting the proverbial seat at the table
14) Recruiters, know your internal bench strength. Be part of your org’s talent review discussions
15) “Use data to speak to business challenges, not HR challenges” – @londonjames

New – and not so new – technology
16) “Mobile isn’t big or clever in recruiting – it’s necessary” @johncampagnino
17) Are you using video to recruit? YouTube videos 600% more likely to come up high in Google search than any other content
18) vmware videoed job descriptions, included out-takes for viral impact, getting thousands of hits a month – great for mobile
19) “Don’t chase every new recruiting technology. Focus on where you can be differentiated; ok to be vanilla where you can’t”
20) putting QR codes on t-shirts at career fairs – pretty cool for GenY

These days I can tell the amount of learning I’m doing at a conference by how tired my thumbs are from tweeting, and it’s fair to say they got quite a workout last week. Check out #bersinimpact on Twitter for more discussion inspired by the event, and follow us at @hireonlinkedin.



 

Making Just-in-Time Talent a Reality



jschnyder | April 11th, 2012 | 6:00 am

Jim Schnyder has spent the last 11 years within the recruiting organization at PepsiCo, a $60B+ global company that counts Pepsi, Frito Lay, Tropicana, Quaker, Gatorade and many other household names in its stable of brands. He is SourceCon’s reigning GrandMaster Sourcer. He also headed up the initial rollout of LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline across PepsiCo’s global talent acquisition team.
headshot_square21

PepsiCo's Jim Schnyder

Imagine a world in which you have a way of sourcing just-in-time talent: where you can map out targeted talent pools in various geographies and functions, easily track their professional updates, cultivate relationships, and turn straight to those pools as opportunities arise in your organization. Now imagine you can do that seamlessly across a global talent acquisition team. I’ve spent the last several months testing and contributing to LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline, a solution that I believe will get us there, sooner than you think.

At PepsiCo, thanks to our global brand strength, we have the fortune of having many active jobseekers in our system. But, like any organization intent on hiring the best of the best, we have our work cut out finding the right candidates. We need to scour the entire talent pool – whether or not they are looking. It’s not until someone taps a happily employed top performer on the shoulder with a stronger opportunity that they lift their head up from what they’re doing on a day-to-day basis and consider a change. Which is why, despite our brand position, recruiting passive prospects has never been more critical to PepsiCo.

As you know, working with passive candidates has a lot in common with the sales process: you need to identify your prospects, do the outreach, build relationships, and manage your pipeline over time, converting leads to candidates and ultimately hires. PepsiCo historically faced a common industry challenge here: managing and tracking our talent leads over time. We tried various CRM tools which suffered from the same major drawback: no sooner did we enter the information than it was out of date. Our leads shifted industries, functions, regions, even names, while their records stayed static.

While our sourcing team tended to use those CRM tools, the broader team either found low value in them or didn’t have access. As a result, they continued to stick with their own ad hoc solutions: a spreadsheet on this hard drive, a pile of business cards in that drawer, a stack of resumes in a file cabinet over there, a bunch of sticky notes on that wall. And with the same ad hoc, low-tech techniques being deployed by colleagues in different markets around the world, the net result: no cohesive talent pool, rather a host of leads across many silos.

I truly think our world is about to shift with LinkedIn’s launch of Talent Pipeline. As one of six charter customers involved in the rollout, I’ve had the opportunity to lead implementation efforts within PepsiCo, work with LinkedIn on making improvements to the product, and drive adoption across our global team. It’s already clear to me that this solution will transform what’s possible for our recruiting organization.

In Talent Pipeline, we now have a centralized system in which we can create talent pools – based on LinkedIn searches, but also from other sources that we upload to the Recruiter platform, such as our own spreadsheets, random files, and more – that are globally accessible, searchable and editable.

We’re already seeing our team collaborate much more willingly, since we leverage source codes for every lead and tag them appropriately, so that we’re able to track everyone’s contributions. Additionally, these new tools are part of the LinkedIn Recruiter platform, which the team was already using. It’s intuitive and it’s almost an industry standard.

And best of all – and this is what makes Talent Pipeline a game changer in my opinion – every lead is current. Many of them are created from deep searches on LinkedIn. Any leads that we upload are cross-checked against LinkedIn’s 150 million plus network and tied to the appropriate profiles. Now, as our prospects move, we are able to follow their progress with up-to-date information and continue to stay in touch. We can also use insights from their activity updates, recommendations, groups and more to keep communications relevant and useful.

So, what’s my vision for just-in-time talent? Here’s an example of how I foresee using this tool in future. Let’s say I routinely recruit accountants in the Boulder, Colorado area. I can run a targeted search using the LinkedIn Recruiter technology to get to that population. Separately, I can network outside of LinkedIn using any of my other favorite sources, gather leads in an excel template and upload them to Talent Pipeline. Many of them will already have LinkedIn profiles, and the system will automatically match them. Others won’t, and that’s OK; LinkedIn will create a record that lives in my system only (not on the public LinkedIn platform).

As time goes by, I can return to this pool, keep in touch with them, and when I’m hiring another CPA in the Boulder area nine months from now, I know exactly where to start. I can filter within that group and selectively send out messages, more or less tapping them on the shoulder to see if they’re interested or know of someone. No more starting from scratch.

I can imagine this same technology being used to help us set up all sorts of similar talent pools – drawing on graduating classes from targeted business schools/colleges, for example, and other populations that can be hard to keep in touch with as they change jobs, locations and even names.

This is just the start of the journey for Talent Pipeline so it isn’t perfect yet – but if you’re looking for a way to build just-in-time pools of prospects and passive candidates, I’d strongly encourage you to check it out when it launches in the next few weeks. No matter how much you love LinkedIn Recruiter, a few months from now you’ll wonder how you ever got along without this new functionality. And if you’re not yet using LinkedIn Recruiter, there has never been a better time to take the plunge.



 

Finding ThoughtWorkers: What Works With Passive Candidates in Brazil



Leela Srinivasan | April 9th, 2012 | 6:00 am


leela_smallWe are back with Part II of our interview series! Read on for your guide to passive candidate recruiting, straight from the mouths of LinkedIn Recruiting Solutions customers who do it best. Today we’re sharing advice from Camila Tartari, who started her career five years ago in a small recruitment consultancy, and now heads up in-house recruiting for ThoughtWorks in Brazil.


Can you comment on the importance of talent camila-captionedto your business?

Talent is core to our business, not only from a technical perspective (developers, testers, analysts), but also from a cultural perspective. We have a strong technically advanced and socially conscious culture, a flat environment, and when recruiting we try hard to target people who will fit well in that environment.

Why does your company focus on recruiting passive candidates?

We didn’t choose to focus on passive talent – it’s the reality of IT. The industry is booming, and top candidates aren’t generally looking for jobs, but we need to always be engaging them.

What’s the biggest mistake you can make when trying to recruit passive candidates?

IT recruiters have a bad reputation and candidates often assume we don’t know what we’re talking about. I’ve made mistakes contacting people who weren’t aligned with the role’s technical requirements and I’ve learned from that. I need to know enough to have a decent conversation about the technology and the role. That’s how I gain respect, and in the long run, it pays off because I end up getting referrals from candidates, based on the relationship I develop with them.

How do you kick off a new req with a hiring manager?

I use the job description to try to understand what we’re looking for and where we can be flexible. It’s unlikely that I’m going to find someone who fits on every level, so I work hard with the team to help spot potential.

Once we’re aligned, I start to target, spending a couple of hours on LinkedIn. But we’re always thinking about ways to get the entire team involved too. We’re hiring our colleagues, so everyone is invested in the process. We encourage the team to help us source, check their LinkedIn connections, and look to sites frequented by technologists such as Github. My colleagues often know the best people, so I am connected to most of them on LinkedIn so I can leverage their networks.

Are you ever “reqless”?

I don’t like to hire only for open positions. I will look at a candidate and ask, ‘”Can they be a ThoughtWorker?” I may have no idea precisely what they might do for us, but if I have a feeling they would fit well here, I’ll pursue it.

What strategies do you use for keeping candidates warm?

It is critical to be very transparent and honest. I’ll tell them know what I’m thinking: “Your profile looks very interesting. Let’s talk about what you’re looking for.” If it doesn’t work out, I do my best to explain why.

I’ll stay in touch by putting reminders in my calendar to follow up. I’ll also build the relationship beyond LinkedIn, via other social sites like Twitter. I want people to know that if they’re ever considering a job or career change, I am here for them and am accessible.

We also have a very event-oriented strategy. I use InMails as a way to reach the community and invite professionals to our events all over South America.

When approaching InMails, what messaging has been most successful for you?

Ideally I write a very personalized one. I’ll begin by presenting who I am and how I’ve found them, then share some company links and highlight key initiatives. But I’m not too formal; I try to make sure they know I’m a human being.

I make the effort to customize my messages to most of the candidates. I’ll get their attention by calling out something specific in their profiles. I mention a mutual connection whenever possible, for example. Ideally I’ll first ask that mutual connection for input, and even to reach out to the candidate before I do.

What, if any, are the differences between recruiting passive candidates as a 3rd party recruiter vs. in-house?

Understanding intimately the culture I’m recruiting for makes a huge difference. I am a ThoughtWorker: that changes the way I communicate with my candidates, and they feel that. Working externally, I would try hard to understand the culture, but I could never quite get there because I had to divide my attention among other clients.

Does your passive candidate recruiting strategy differ depending on seniority of position to fill? How so?

The more senior, the more I work on the relationship. Fresher talent gets easily excited by our culture and opportunities, whereas senior technologists may require more investment of time in conversations about what we can offer and why they should consider us. It requires me to speak their language, and be ready to learn from them. I must earn the respect of candidates, show them I really understand, and listen to them.

What response would you give to a recruiting leader who says, ‘my team and I don’t have time to focus on passive candidates’?

It’s very unlikely that you’ll reach the very top talent if you’re not sourcing passive candidates, because those people, even more than those new to the industry, just aren’t looking for work.

thoughtworks_takeaways_blog1 

What are some of your best practices? Tweet your ideas using the hashtag #passivetalent



 

Secrets of Recruiters with the Best InMail Response Rates: Centrica’s James Dowling



Leela Srinivasan | March 29th, 2012 | 6:00 am

leela_smallLet’s face it: recruiting passive talent can be challenging. What does it take to attract the highest quality candidates, the ones who are satisfied and productive in their current jobs? This is the first in a series of posts showcasing the insights, tips and tools driving the success of some of the best passive candidate recruiters.

We analyzed data from thousands of LinkedIn Recruiting SolutionsCentrica's James Dowling
customers globally and conducted in-depth interviews with seven customers who have among the highest InMail response rates (InMail is LinkedIn’s messaging tool). Through these conversations, we uncovered critical insights and practical tips that you can implement in your day-to-day job. We kicked things off with James Dowling, who spent the first eight years of his career in 3rd party search before moving in-house in 2008 to work for Centrica Plc, a UK headquartered Energy company.

Why does your company focus on recruiting passive candidates?

Talent is enormously important to Centrica. People make all the difference, especially as we are a service organization, so we are focused on hiring the best.

Interestingly, many of our most successful individuals haven’t come from our industry: they tend to come from Retail Banking, Financial Services, Telecommunications, IT – they are all fast paced, complex, multi-channel businesses. Our downstream business model is more in line with theirs, but they may not be thinking about a career in Energy. Therefore we have to headhunt the right talent.

What’s the biggest mistake you can make when trying to recruit passive candidates?

A scattergun approach, with mass communication and untargeted emails, does not work. Instead, a focused target approach does.

Inviting an open conversation works too, rather than proposing a specific role.  So instead of, “Can I talk to you about XYZ role?” it is better to write, “I wanted to introduce you to our company. Let’s talk about your career and see if something is suitable.” People are then far more open to responding.

In order to get candidates’ attention, I create a meaningful incentive that’s relevant to them. For example, if I were targeting someone from Retail Banking, I would contrast their industry’s current cost-cutting environment with the opportunity for growth in the Energy sector. I want to be specific, thinking about what that candidate is going through, and what he/she wants.

How much time do you spend finding exactly the right professional profiles at the outset?

I have to have a total understanding of the business, the role, and the type of person we want. The more research I can do up front, the better the results. I am far more interested in spending 10 hours researching 15 candidates and getting a dozen promising responses than spending five hours reaching 100 candidates, but only getting three such responses.

Getting to know where we acquire our talent is important too. We uncover trends by understanding which companies and sectors we’ve recruited from, and then track those employees’ progress in our organization per business areas (upstream and downstream Energy and by function). We further research those companies qualitatively; we want to understand why high performing employees hired from Company A are successful while those from Company B never are.

How do you kick off a new requirement with a hiring manager?

It’s an intensive face-to-face process. I have to go though the job description with them and challenge it. I also get an independent perspective on the role from another HR colleague if I can.  I ask where the hiring manager wants to find this person, and what companies and sectors are doing it well. We create a matrix together: sectors by companies, and then target the actual roles, titles, and experience that we want.

The more expert I am with each assignment, the more hiring managers will trust me as their strategic resourcing partner. LinkedIn data is part of the knowledge I bring to the relationship; when market mapping, for example, we fill 60 percent of it or more with LinkedIn candidates.

Any advice on winning over a hiring manager who doesn’t think you have the expertise?

I come prepared with a range of strong profiles, and ask, “Is this what you’re looking for?” It shows them what I know and helps persuade them to accept that we can recruit without an external headhunter. Also I prepare for an initial internal meeting as I would if I were an external search consultant, sometimes more.

What’s your favorite success story in recruiting a passive candidate?

We wanted to recruit an Underwriting Director (Senior Vice President) for a new business we created – British Gas Insurance. It was a very niche role, very senior, and in a business sector we had no name for at the time. Through LinkedIn we mapped out the market and we brought in an outstanding candidate from a top-five global insurance company. One of the insurance company board directors praised the resourcing team for our innovative approach.

dowling-takeaways_blog

What are some of your best practices in recruiting passive candidates? Tweet your thoughts with the hashtag #passivetalent. We want to hear from you!

Stay tuned for our next conversation with Brazil-based Camila Tartari of Thoughtworks. She has a trick for getting an inMail response that works almost 100 percent of the time!