Archive for the ‘By Recruiter Customers’ Category

Bersin IMPACT Conference, Told in 20 Tweets



Leela Srinivasan | April 16th, 2012 | 6:55 am

leela_small1Bersin & Associates has hosted its IMPACT conference for five years now, but it’s only in the last year or two that talent acquisition has become a significant portion of the program. I had the chance to attend the event in St. Petersburg, FL last week and was impressed by the caliber of the attendees and the discussion.

Rather than rehash the conference in long-form, I’ve aggregated 20 tweets into six themes that capture my main observations, from Josh Bersin’s keynote and from the talent acquisition-focused breakout sessions:

Sweeping trends
1) #1 driver of HR change: accelerated globalization. “China now feels like Tokyo” @josh_bersin
2) #2 driver of HR change: global talent imbalance & emergence of “the expertise economy”
3) #3 driver of HR change: emergence of Big Data & impact on talent analytics

It’s all about the candidate
4) “Candidate relationship management isn’t a technology, it’s a practice” – Kim Lamoureux
5) Give EVERY candidate in your funnel a positive experience, even at the very top #passivetalent
6) Eaton Corp: does your career page help people self-select into applying? Wrong candidates in funnel dilute recruiting impact
7) Halliburton: employer brand does NOT equal marketing campaign, though every touchpoint has at least 1 component of our EVP

Leveraging every employee in talent acquisition
8) UnitedHealthcare: what % of YOUR employees participate in your employee referral program? Are the rest struggling to articulate your brand?
9) “It’s not just RECRUITING’S job to recruit, it’s EVERYONE’S job”. Heather Lemke speaks the truth!

The present – and future – of recruiting
10) Name generation is commoditized – “I could teach my 10 yr old to source” – REAL recruiting skills making a comeback
11) “An agile organization is always recruiting” – farming, branding, relationship mgt.
12) Social IS recruiting for us. It’s how we go to market – @ljbrock
13) Could recruiting REALLY report into marketing in the next 5 years?

Getting the proverbial seat at the table
14) Recruiters, know your internal bench strength. Be part of your org’s talent review discussions
15) “Use data to speak to business challenges, not HR challenges” – @londonjames

New – and not so new – technology
16) “Mobile isn’t big or clever in recruiting – it’s necessary” @johncampagnino
17) Are you using video to recruit? YouTube videos 600% more likely to come up high in Google search than any other content
18) vmware videoed job descriptions, included out-takes for viral impact, getting thousands of hits a month – great for mobile
19) “Don’t chase every new recruiting technology. Focus on where you can be differentiated; ok to be vanilla where you can’t”
20) putting QR codes on t-shirts at career fairs – pretty cool for GenY

These days I can tell the amount of learning I’m doing at a conference by how tired my thumbs are from tweeting, and it’s fair to say they got quite a workout last week. Check out #bersinimpact on Twitter for more discussion inspired by the event, and follow us at @hireonlinkedin.



 

Making Just-in-Time Talent a Reality



jschnyder | April 11th, 2012 | 6:00 am

Jim Schnyder has spent the last 11 years within the recruiting organization at PepsiCo, a $60B+ global company that counts Pepsi, Frito Lay, Tropicana, Quaker, Gatorade and many other household names in its stable of brands. He is SourceCon’s reigning GrandMaster Sourcer. He also headed up the initial rollout of LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline across PepsiCo’s global talent acquisition team.
headshot_square21

PepsiCo's Jim Schnyder

Imagine a world in which you have a way of sourcing just-in-time talent: where you can map out targeted talent pools in various geographies and functions, easily track their professional updates, cultivate relationships, and turn straight to those pools as opportunities arise in your organization. Now imagine you can do that seamlessly across a global talent acquisition team. I’ve spent the last several months testing and contributing to LinkedIn’s Talent Pipeline, a solution that I believe will get us there, sooner than you think.

At PepsiCo, thanks to our global brand strength, we have the fortune of having many active jobseekers in our system. But, like any organization intent on hiring the best of the best, we have our work cut out finding the right candidates. We need to scour the entire talent pool – whether or not they are looking. It’s not until someone taps a happily employed top performer on the shoulder with a stronger opportunity that they lift their head up from what they’re doing on a day-to-day basis and consider a change. Which is why, despite our brand position, recruiting passive prospects has never been more critical to PepsiCo.

As you know, working with passive candidates has a lot in common with the sales process: you need to identify your prospects, do the outreach, build relationships, and manage your pipeline over time, converting leads to candidates and ultimately hires. PepsiCo historically faced a common industry challenge here: managing and tracking our talent leads over time. We tried various CRM tools which suffered from the same major drawback: no sooner did we enter the information than it was out of date. Our leads shifted industries, functions, regions, even names, while their records stayed static.

While our sourcing team tended to use those CRM tools, the broader team either found low value in them or didn’t have access. As a result, they continued to stick with their own ad hoc solutions: a spreadsheet on this hard drive, a pile of business cards in that drawer, a stack of resumes in a file cabinet over there, a bunch of sticky notes on that wall. And with the same ad hoc, low-tech techniques being deployed by colleagues in different markets around the world, the net result: no cohesive talent pool, rather a host of leads across many silos.

I truly think our world is about to shift with LinkedIn’s launch of Talent Pipeline. As one of six charter customers involved in the rollout, I’ve had the opportunity to lead implementation efforts within PepsiCo, work with LinkedIn on making improvements to the product, and drive adoption across our global team. It’s already clear to me that this solution will transform what’s possible for our recruiting organization.

In Talent Pipeline, we now have a centralized system in which we can create talent pools – based on LinkedIn searches, but also from other sources that we upload to the Recruiter platform, such as our own spreadsheets, random files, and more – that are globally accessible, searchable and editable.

We’re already seeing our team collaborate much more willingly, since we leverage source codes for every lead and tag them appropriately, so that we’re able to track everyone’s contributions. Additionally, these new tools are part of the LinkedIn Recruiter platform, which the team was already using. It’s intuitive and it’s almost an industry standard.

And best of all – and this is what makes Talent Pipeline a game changer in my opinion – every lead is current. Many of them are created from deep searches on LinkedIn. Any leads that we upload are cross-checked against LinkedIn’s 150 million plus network and tied to the appropriate profiles. Now, as our prospects move, we are able to follow their progress with up-to-date information and continue to stay in touch. We can also use insights from their activity updates, recommendations, groups and more to keep communications relevant and useful.

So, what’s my vision for just-in-time talent? Here’s an example of how I foresee using this tool in future. Let’s say I routinely recruit accountants in the Boulder, Colorado area. I can run a targeted search using the LinkedIn Recruiter technology to get to that population. Separately, I can network outside of LinkedIn using any of my other favorite sources, gather leads in an excel template and upload them to Talent Pipeline. Many of them will already have LinkedIn profiles, and the system will automatically match them. Others won’t, and that’s OK; LinkedIn will create a record that lives in my system only (not on the public LinkedIn platform).

As time goes by, I can return to this pool, keep in touch with them, and when I’m hiring another CPA in the Boulder area nine months from now, I know exactly where to start. I can filter within that group and selectively send out messages, more or less tapping them on the shoulder to see if they’re interested or know of someone. No more starting from scratch.

I can imagine this same technology being used to help us set up all sorts of similar talent pools – drawing on graduating classes from targeted business schools/colleges, for example, and other populations that can be hard to keep in touch with as they change jobs, locations and even names.

This is just the start of the journey for Talent Pipeline so it isn’t perfect yet – but if you’re looking for a way to build just-in-time pools of prospects and passive candidates, I’d strongly encourage you to check it out when it launches in the next few weeks. No matter how much you love LinkedIn Recruiter, a few months from now you’ll wonder how you ever got along without this new functionality. And if you’re not yet using LinkedIn Recruiter, there has never been a better time to take the plunge.



 

Secrets of Recruiters with the Best InMail Response Rates: Centrica’s James Dowling



Leela Srinivasan | March 29th, 2012 | 6:00 am

leela_smallLet’s face it: recruiting passive talent can be challenging. What does it take to attract the highest quality candidates, the ones who are satisfied and productive in their current jobs? This is the first in a series of posts showcasing the insights, tips and tools driving the success of some of the best passive candidate recruiters.

We analyzed data from thousands of LinkedIn Recruiting SolutionsCentrica's James Dowling
customers globally and conducted in-depth interviews with seven customers who have among the highest InMail response rates (InMail is LinkedIn’s messaging tool). Through these conversations, we uncovered critical insights and practical tips that you can implement in your day-to-day job. We kicked things off with James Dowling, who spent the first eight years of his career in 3rd party search before moving in-house in 2008 to work for Centrica Plc, a UK headquartered Energy company.

Why does your company focus on recruiting passive candidates?

Talent is enormously important to Centrica. People make all the difference, especially as we are a service organization, so we are focused on hiring the best.

Interestingly, many of our most successful individuals haven’t come from our industry: they tend to come from Retail Banking, Financial Services, Telecommunications, IT – they are all fast paced, complex, multi-channel businesses. Our downstream business model is more in line with theirs, but they may not be thinking about a career in Energy. Therefore we have to headhunt the right talent.

What’s the biggest mistake you can make when trying to recruit passive candidates?

A scattergun approach, with mass communication and untargeted emails, does not work. Instead, a focused target approach does.

Inviting an open conversation works too, rather than proposing a specific role.  So instead of, “Can I talk to you about XYZ role?” it is better to write, “I wanted to introduce you to our company. Let’s talk about your career and see if something is suitable.” People are then far more open to responding.

In order to get candidates’ attention, I create a meaningful incentive that’s relevant to them. For example, if I were targeting someone from Retail Banking, I would contrast their industry’s current cost-cutting environment with the opportunity for growth in the Energy sector. I want to be specific, thinking about what that candidate is going through, and what he/she wants.

How much time do you spend finding exactly the right professional profiles at the outset?

I have to have a total understanding of the business, the role, and the type of person we want. The more research I can do up front, the better the results. I am far more interested in spending 10 hours researching 15 candidates and getting a dozen promising responses than spending five hours reaching 100 candidates, but only getting three such responses.

Getting to know where we acquire our talent is important too. We uncover trends by understanding which companies and sectors we’ve recruited from, and then track those employees’ progress in our organization per business areas (upstream and downstream Energy and by function). We further research those companies qualitatively; we want to understand why high performing employees hired from Company A are successful while those from Company B never are.

How do you kick off a new requirement with a hiring manager?

It’s an intensive face-to-face process. I have to go though the job description with them and challenge it. I also get an independent perspective on the role from another HR colleague if I can.  I ask where the hiring manager wants to find this person, and what companies and sectors are doing it well. We create a matrix together: sectors by companies, and then target the actual roles, titles, and experience that we want.

The more expert I am with each assignment, the more hiring managers will trust me as their strategic resourcing partner. LinkedIn data is part of the knowledge I bring to the relationship; when market mapping, for example, we fill 60 percent of it or more with LinkedIn candidates.

Any advice on winning over a hiring manager who doesn’t think you have the expertise?

I come prepared with a range of strong profiles, and ask, “Is this what you’re looking for?” It shows them what I know and helps persuade them to accept that we can recruit without an external headhunter. Also I prepare for an initial internal meeting as I would if I were an external search consultant, sometimes more.

What’s your favorite success story in recruiting a passive candidate?

We wanted to recruit an Underwriting Director (Senior Vice President) for a new business we created – British Gas Insurance. It was a very niche role, very senior, and in a business sector we had no name for at the time. Through LinkedIn we mapped out the market and we brought in an outstanding candidate from a top-five global insurance company. One of the insurance company board directors praised the resourcing team for our innovative approach.

dowling-takeaways_blog

What are some of your best practices in recruiting passive candidates? Tweet your thoughts with the hashtag #passivetalent. We want to hear from you!

Stay tuned for our next conversation with Brazil-based Camila Tartari of Thoughtworks. She has a trick for getting an inMail response that works almost 100 percent of the time!



 

Questions for…Peter Moore, Senior Manager of Talent Acquisition at Sony Electronics



Catherine Gutermuth | February 21st, 2012 | 2:01 pm

Catherine GutermuthSince he joined Sony Electronics (SEL) in March 2011, Peter Moore has revamped his company’s employment brand, driven incredible scale in his team’s recruiting activities, and re-positioned Talent Acquisition as a strategic partner to the business. We recently spoke with Peter to learn more about his transformational first year at SEL.

How did you come to work at Sony Electronics?
I was actually identified by Sony Electronics through LinkedIn in December 2010. Sony was looking to hire someone who had a strong presence in social media and was active within the LinkedIn community, and my profile came to the surface. I was based out of Chicago at the time, working for a major retailer. Sony was interested in my background in social media and in retail (given SEL’s retail presence)—the two worlds came together and here I am in San Diego a year later!

Tell us about your role and your team.
I head up Talent Acquisition at SEL. My focus is on positioning our employment brand, attracting candidates, driving recruiter metrics, and managing my team of 14 direct reports.

peter-moore

In my short time at Sony I’ve restructured our talent organization and rolled out a research model. We now have a department of two researchers who are responsible for sourcing and pipelining talent, in addition to recruiters (each carrying about 30-40 reqs), coordinators, and a department admin.

What challenges did you face when you joined SEL?
Up until four years ago, SEL’s corporate headquarters was based out of Park Ridge, New Jersey. Once we moved to San Diego, not many people even knew we were there. We were trying to tap into a market and people just didn’t know we were recruiting.

When I joined the organization, Sony had a post-and-pray approach to recruiting. That lack of awareness in the market obviously worked against us when we were posting and praying. My recruiters couldn’t fill positions because no one was applying, and we didn’t really have an effective approach to sourcing.

What did you do to drive awareness and build your employment brand in the San Diego market?
We’ve focused on a number of initiatives to get the message out there that we are local, and we are recruiting.  We’ve partnered with several local organizations, but we’re also spending a lot of time with our recruiters to get the message out to the candidate population—and to those passive candidates—that we are recruiting and we’ll continue to grow. It’s not just about messaging candidates through LinkedIn to say, “we have this opportunity available”—it’s about messaging them to talk about Sony and the exciting things going on here.

You noted that when you joined SEL the recruiting organization didn’t have an effective approach to sourcing. How have you changed that and encouraged direct sourcing within your team?
The first thing I did on arrival was to make sure we had a LinkedIn Recruiter license for each of our recruiters and researchers.  We took them through training and coaching so they knew how to use it. Within five months, LinkedIn had become the source of 25% of our hires.

My recruiters now go to requisition meetings with a slate of candidates that are applicable for that role. They sit down to talk to the hiring managers about the market, what the trends are, where we think we can find the people for this opportunity or where we think we’re going to struggle. We’re becoming much more strategic in supporting the business—not just sitting down and asking what the hiring manager needs, but advising them on how we can recruit exactly what they’re looking for.

Tell us about your approach to social media for recruiting at SEL.
When I joined SEL, our social media was very consumer-centric: we had no focus on employment branding. My focus was to come up with a very simple social media strategy. I didn’t want to make it overly complicated, and didn’t have a huge budget to spend.

I’m the type of person who asks for forgiveness instead of permission, and I was really trying to go it alone—which wasn’t easy. Now, we’re beginning to partner much more closely with our social media and communications team to leverage their resources. I can’t go it alone; my team is small, and there’s no way I can go out there and do everything we want to do with social media, and still recruit the top talent that we need to go for.  That’s why leveraging our internal workforce has been key.

How have you leveraged your employee base to drive scale in recruiting?
One of my goals at the beginning of our fiscal year was to enhance what we were doing with LinkedIn.  The biggest advancement for me has been our use of Work with Us Ads. These ads appear on the profiles of all 4,000 SEL employees across North America, and they target our opportunities to the individuals viewing our employee profiles, encouraging them to “Picture Yourself” working at SEL. It’s allowed us to utilize our employees to promote our opportunities without them having to do anything!

picture-46

Every time someone clicks on one of our employees and then sees a relevant opportunity, it brings them to the business faster than we can find them. In my mind, that doubles our workforce. It does a lot of the heavy lifting for us so we can focus on other strategic projects and on collaborating with our hiring managers, because we know LinkedIn is hard at work for us behind the scenes. LinkedIn is working when I’m sleeping. To me, that’s a huge takeaway for anyone in our business when we’re always being asked to do more with less.

How has LinkedIn transformed recruiting at SEL?
All in all, LinkedIn has made us look more intelligent to the business. With LinkedIn’s help, we’ve become a strategic partner versus just an order taker.

To learn more about Peter’s story, visit our resources page.



 

Questions for… Simon Heaton, Head of Executive Recruiting for Walmart in Asia



Leela Srinivasan | January 5th, 2012 | 6:00 am

2011 was a big year for Hong Kong-based Simon Heaton. In just 11 months he built Walmart’s Asian executive recruiting team, which today sources 80 percent of its hires directly as opposed to through recruitment agencies. I recently spoke with Simon to learn more about the realities of recruiting in Asia in 2012.

Tell us about Walmart’s Asian business and how you support it. Simon Heaton, Walmart

Walmart has a number of businesses in Asia, from our Japanese retail business Seiyu, to our Indian joint venture (Bharti Group), to our Chinese operations under the Walmart banner. My team supports executive recruiting across the region. We’ve also helped build our e-commerce presence in China, and we support our global sourcing business based in Shenzhen.  

We’re a new team at Walmart, run as an internal recruitment company.  We’ll take a look at the brief and, using tools like LinkedIn Recruiter and Twitter, we’ll see if we can take the assignment on directly or need the support of one of our preferred search firms. My team consists of ex-headhunters plucked from the industry. I myself started out as a vendor to Walmart, but ultimately the move in-house made sense.

The economy continues to occupy the headlines in Europe and the US. What’s the mood across Asia and how is it affecting the way you recruit?

Our business is in a different place to most. Our challenge is growth – how do we grow big and fast enough in our region?

What skill sets are hardest to find in Asian markets? How is your team finding those people?

Our main challenge is that organized retail hasn’t existed to the same extent in Asia as it has in the West. We have to train people. We also repatriate Asian professionals who’ve developed the necessary skills in established markets. LinkedIn has been a key resource for us in finding populations in the US and UK with Asian backgrounds and Western retail training. Then comes the challenge of convincing them to move home. 

How do professionals react to passive candidate recruiting in your markets?

We’ve found them extremely open to it in some countries. Social media is being rapidly adopted in China and India in particular. My first approach is typically an InMail, and we’ve seen a response rate of around 40 percent in China, on a par with the US. In India, it’s almost 100 percent! In a market like Japan however, it’s harder because there isn’t the same emphasis on building your personal brand. But we’re brainstorming ways to work together with LinkedIn on changing professional attitudes. 

What successes are you most proud of achieving at Walmart in Asia so far? What role have LinkedIn Recruiting Solutions played in that success?

My greatest success to date is recruiting the senior leadership team for our e-commerce business. Within six weeks we had the team recruited and onboarded – 100 percent through LinkedIn Recruiter and other mapping exercises. Recruiter is the fastest way for us to find the right people, though of course you then have to convince them to interview and so on.

Through LinkedIn Recruiting Solutions we’ve significantly sped up the process of finding where people are. Within a very short time frame we can now develop a robust list of potential candidates to discuss with the hiring manager.  All in all, the tools are incredibly good value as long as people continue to respect LinkedIn as a business networking tool, which I believe they will.

LinkedIn Recruiter has also given much broader reach to some of the roles we recruit. When I started in recruiting back in 1997, I didn’t even have a computer. I had a rolodex, a phone, and my relationships. We recently hired a senior leader in Asia whom I wouldn’t have found previously, because she didn’t work for an organization we would have considered as part of our target list. But she came up when we searched on LinkedIn and she ended up being by far the most qualified candidate.

Are you hiring recruiters for your team right now? What sort of experience are you looking for?

Yes. We’re always on the lookout for good, hungry, hunter-type recruiters. 

How does your in-house role suit you?

I got tired of working in the search industry where everything becomes about the fee. Today I get most of my satisfaction from helping people, from seeing them progress in their careers.  I’ve recruited 150 director-level and above professionals for Walmart in the last three years. 95 percent of them still work for the company, and 25 percent have been promoted.

What’s interesting is that LinkedIn is more than just the tool that helps me introduce them to the company. LinkedIn also helps me keep track of their career progress at Walmart. We use internal systems, but quite often it’s faster to pull up a LinkedIn profile if you’re comparing internal and external candidates.

What’s the single biggest thing on your mind as you prepare for a new year of recruiting?

For us it’s about finding the best people in the lowest total cost way. I don’t mind paying a headhunter for someone who will transform our organization. How do you find the people who are the best possible bet for the business? How do you tie together sourcing, referencing, making sure people fit with us culturally, onboarding them and helping them be successful? Psychometrics are not perfect; how do we get better at predicting people’s overall fit for the position?

Complete the sentence: LinkedIn is…

Transformational. It has transformed how I recruit.